Empire of the Gael?
We must not minimize the shattering importance of that initial insight- peoples being conscious of themselves as prisoners in their own land- for it returns again and again in the literature of the imperialalized world. The history of empire- punctuated by uprisings throughout most of the nieteenth century... seems incoherent unless one recognises the sense of beleagured imprisonment infused with passion for community that grounds anti-imperial resistence in cultural effort.
Said moves on to "look again at the literature of these moments of anti-imperialist resistence
If there is anything that radically distinguishes the imagination of anti-imperialism, it is the primacy of the geographical element. Imperialism after all is an act of geographical violence through which virtually every space in the world is explored, charted and finally brought under control. For the native, the history of colonial servitude is inaugurated by loss of the locality to the outsider; its geographical identity must thereafter be searched for and somehow restored. becuase of the presence of the outsider, the land is recoverable at first only through the imagination.
Said then uses Yeats to illustrate this 'recovery of geographical identity through the imagination', since Ireland was England's first 'colony' and the first to break away from the British Empire.
But what of Scotland? Here the situation becomes very complicated and confusing. One reason why Scotland entered a 'union' with England in 1707 was the failure of the Scots to establish their own mini-empire in South America - the Darien Colony. Once joined with England, the Scots became willing and active players in the game of Empire, providing the soldiers, settlers, traders, missionaries, engineers and administrators without whom the Britiish Empire could not have functioned. It is estimated that there are around 50 million people of Scots descent scattered around Britain's former colonies.
Nor did Scottish nationalism become a political force until the tide of empire began to ebb away. The first Scottish National Party MP was not elected until 1947, the year India and Pakistan gained independence after generations of struggle. The high point of SNP success did not come until 1974, when they managed to get 11 MPs elected. Scotland has had, since 1999, its own devolved parliament but this was more a reward for the Scots staying loyal to Labour through 18 years of Conservative government rather than the direct result of Scottish nationalism. Indeed, it ca be argued that devolution was a calculated ploy by a Labour government to ensure the continued loyalty of Scotland to Labour - without which Labour would struggle to keep their majority at Westminster.
But having allowed Scotland a parliament, have Labour set in motion a historic and cultural process which will eventually see the break up of the United Kingdom by giving the Scots the power to 'recover' a Scotland of the imagination?
By this I mean to creatively re-write Scotland's history as that of a Gaelic speaking nation and people unwillingly and forcibly drawn into England's dream of empire by a process of cultural imperialism via 'Anglicisation'. So that by passing a Gaelic Language (Scotland) Act which will forcefully encourage all public bodies in Scotland to draw up 'gaelic language policies' and to encourage the teaching of Gaelic across all of Scotland (not just those aeas with indigenous Gaelic speaking populations), a new Gaelic speaking Scotland will eventually emerge.
Which is fine, except that the high point of Gaelic as a national langauge was a thousand years ago. Even then, this was the result of aggressive expansion by what was to become the kingdom of the Scots into areas where Gaelic was not the native tongue, where people spoke Pictish , Welsh, Old English and Norse.
The expansion into the fertile and more wealthy south of what is now Scotland (occupied by Old English speakers for 500 years) led to conflicts with Normans moving northwards. Only by recruiting these Normans , like Robert de Brus, ancestor of Robert the Bruce and settling them to defend the fertile zones, were Scots kings able to defend their frontiers. But in so doing, cultural power and influence shifted away from the Gaelic speaking heartlands of Scotland through the middle ages.
If there is a national language of Scotland, it is Scots not Gaelic.





